• Users Online: 91
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 
Table of Contents
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 13-17

Oncofertility in males: A literature review


Department of Reproductive Medicine, Gunasheela Surgical and Maternity Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Date of Submission30-Dec-2020
Date of Acceptance31-Dec-2020
Date of Web Publication30-Jan-2021

Correspondence Address:
Dr. N Ashwini
Gunasheela Surgical and Maternity Hospital, No. 1, Dewan N Madhava Rao Road, Basavanagudi, Bengaluru - 560 004, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/tofj.tofj_9_20

Get Permissions

  Abstract 


The aim of this study was to evaluate current literature on oncofertility specifically in males. We convey that malignancies on its own result in compromising semen quality in males, subsequently causing infertility or impaired fertility. Testicular cancer and Hodgkin's disease are aggressive in causing infertility compared to other malignancies. This review also aims to address the gonadotoxic nature of cancer therapy, outlining the cytotoxicity of radio and chemotherapy. We also address techniques that major fertility centers utilize for fertility preservation in males, specifically semen cryopreservation. Prepubertal males with malignancies are also assumed early care in fertility protection, experimental techniques such as spermatogonial stem cells preservation, and testicular tissue freezing has quickly become prevalent in giving patients hope of parenthood. Finally, we discuss some current oncofertility guidelines to care for male patients with cancers. We also evaluate the ethical constrains of semen cryopreservation and overall providing oncofertility care.

Keywords: Cryopreservation, gonodotoxic, malignancy, prepubertal males


How to cite this article:
Ashwini N, Appaneravanda LC, Gunasheela D. Oncofertility in males: A literature review. Onco Fertil J 2020;3:13-7

How to cite this URL:
Ashwini N, Appaneravanda LC, Gunasheela D. Oncofertility in males: A literature review. Onco Fertil J [serial online] 2020 [cited 2021 May 10];3:13-7. Available from: https://www.tofjonline.org/text.asp?2020/3/1/13/308410




  Introduction Top


In India, the projected number of cancer patients for the year 2020 is 13 lakhs as per the national cancer registry, with an estimated 12% raise by 2025.[1],[2] Forty-three percent of cancers in men comprise prostate, lung, and colorectal cancers.[1],[3] The rate of new cases of cancer is 442.4/1 lakh men per year.[4] The most common cancers diagnosed in the reproductive age (15–45) are leukemia, bone, testicular cancer, and Hodgkin's lymphoma.[5] As a result of treatment innovations, the survival rates of young people with cancer have increased substantially. With 65% overall survival rates of young cancer patients treated with radiation and chemotherapeutic agents, the prevalence of long-term survivors in young adult population has been estimated to be 1 in 1000.[6],[7] It has been well established that male reproductive potential is compromised because of cancer treatment such as chemo/radiotherapy.[8],[9] Precision medicine is helping move cancer treatment from one-size-fits-all model to a more specific cancer therapy based on the detailed evaluation of the cancer subtype.[10] These advancements in cancer treatments have given a chance for a good percentage of patients suffering from malignancies to consider parenthood as an option through fertility preservation.[11]

This review aims to better understand the effects of cancer and cancer treatment on male fertility and also sheds light on current oncofertility recommendations. A review of recent literature has been carried out with an extensive literature search carried out on EMBASE, Scopus, and MEDLINE.


  Effect of Malignancies on Male Fertility Top


Spermatogenesis and overall semen quality decline in the presence of malignancies as reported by multiple studies.[9],[12] However, certain types of cancers are more detrimental to sperm health than other types. Sex hormones in males are downregulated in cancer patients due to stress. Endocrine environment of tumor site causes alterations to the reproductive hormone activity.[9],[13] Tumors release cytokines which affect sperm motility. In certain cancers such as leukemia, lymphoma, and neurological cancers, the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis might be directly impaired by the invasion of tumor cells.[9],[14] A number of studies report that malignancies might cause malnutrition in patients, causing deficiency in key vitamins, minerals, and trace elements that is needed for optimal gonadal function.[9],[15] Cancers such as Hodgkin's lymphoma are associated with periodic spikes in fever (B-symptoms). Hyperthermia elevates scrotal temperatures causing damage to germinal epithelium, thus decreasing spermatogenic functions.[16],[17],[18] Several studies have indicated that histological modifications such as dysgenesis syndrome (25.2%), fibrosis of the seminiferous tubules (24%–60%), sertoli cell only syndrome (8%), and in situ carcinoma (5%–8%) are evident in the contralateral testis in patients with testicular cancer.[19],[20] Impairment of spermatogenesis in cancer patients with testicular cancer is multifactorial and may be related to (i) hormonal aberration (increased follicle-stimulating hormone, b-human chorionic gonadotrophin, a-fetoprotein, estradiol, and luteinizing hormone and decreased inhibin B and testosterone); (ii) a history of cryptorchidism, which seems to present more frequently in males with testicular cancer (Van Casteren NJ et al., 2008); and (iii) general dysfunction due to cancer itself (increased catabolic rate and malnutrition).[20],[21]


  Impact of Oncology Therapy on Male Fertility Top


Radiotherapy

The testicular cells, especially the fast dividing sperm cells, are extremely sensitive to irradiation. The potential to recovery depends not only on the dose of radiation and dose per fraction but also the survival of spermatogonial population within the testis.[22] Low cytotoxic doses do destroy the pool of differentiating spermatogonia but are likely to result in only a temporary cessation in spermatogenesis. If the radiation dose is high, the spermatogonial stem cell (SSCs) number is drastically decreased and recovery may take many years.[22] With doses of more than 4 Gy, all the SSCs are depleted rendering the patient permanently sterile.[9],[23]

Radiotherapy relies on ionization of the atoms and molecules in the cell which causes the disruption of DNA integrity.[24],[25] This will consecutively disrupt the cell cycle causing apoptosis of cells. Radiotherapy is widely used in oncological care, as malignant cells do not have the potential to repair after radio exposure like healthy cells. Like cancer cells, germ cells are prone to similar effects.[9],[23],[24] The Leydig cells are more resistant to irradiation and dose of more than 20 Gy is needed to produce hypogonadism. Testicular irradiation used to treat carcinoma of testis is associated with high rate of permanent sterility.[24],[25] Vascular disease induced by pelvic radiation can reduce blood flow in the pelvic and penile vessels causing erectile dysfunction as a long-term complication.[26]

Chemotherapy

In humans, the testis is more sensitive to chemotherapy than the ovary [Table 1].[9],[23] Gonadotoxicity of the testis affects spermatogenesis more than testosterone production, as the germinal epithelium is extremely vulnerable when compared to the Leydig cells.[27],[28],[29],[30] The germinal cell division is extremely high through increased meiotic and mitotic activity, thus allowing for increased sensitivity to Cytotoxic agents [Table 1].[23],[24],[31] Sexual maturation of the testis also influences the degree of gonadal damage experienced when exposed to cytotoxic drugs, the prepuberal testis being less susceptible than post pubertal testis [Table 1].[31]
Table 1: The risk of chemotherapy for impairment of spermatogenesis[23]

Click here to view



  Strategies for Fertility Preservation in Males Top


Lack of time in case of cancer patients and lack of care provider knowledge on infertility risk have been identified as the main barriers for fertility preservation in patient care.[23],[32] Enhanced communication between oncologist and reproductive specialists leads to increased patient referrals and acceptance rates.[23],[33]

Semen banking is a choice for male cancer patients capable of producing a semen sample before commencing cancer treatment. Semen banking should be done before chemo/radiotherapy is initiated. When young males are unable to ejaculate, electroejaculation or epididymal or testicular sperm extraction may be done.[34] The frozen semen sample can be utilized for either artificial insemination or intracytoplasmic sperm injection with varied pregnancy rates. Semen sample can be stored indefinitely in liquid nitrogen.[33] Patients can opt to come back after cancer remission to continue journey to parenthood.[35]


  Fertility Preservation in Prepubertal Males Top


In prepubertal males, dialogue with patient and parents is shown to be critical for informed decision-making. Parents and patients must be informed about the experimental nature of fertility preservation in prepubertal boys.[36] The possible further use of frozen testicular tissue remaining a research activity should be discussed. In peripubertal boys, it is possible to freeze spermatozoa after sperm collection by masturbation or testicular sperm extraction. Testicular sperm extraction can also be combined with testicular tissue freezing in order to store SSCs if no sperm is retrieved during the surgery.[36],[37],[38]

In prepubertal boys who do not produce spermatozoa, testicular tissue freezing with the objective of preserving SSCs can be performed. Testicular tissue biopsy is preferably unilateral and is done according to local surgical procedures.[36],[37],[39] Cryopreservation of testicular tissue provides opportunity to pursue either cell or tissue-based therapies in future.[6],[36]

At present, no standardized protocol has been established for human testicular tissue freezing in terms of optimal cryopreservation techniques or fertility restoration procedures to be able to generate spermatozoa. However, the most commonly used freezing protocol is controlled slow freezing with seeding.[36],[40],[41]

Transplantation method has been adapted for human testis, and the efficiency and safety of the technique are being evaluated in mouse and primate models.[36],[42] Data have been collected from 24 coordinating centers worldwide which are actively offering testicular tissue cryopreservation to safeguard the future fertility of boys.[36] There has been a 4-fold increase in the number of patients stored testicular tissue since 2012. More than 1033 young patients between 3 months and 18 years have already undergone testicular tissue retrieval and storage for fertility preservation.[36] Approaches which are under extensive research include in vitro culture or autologous transplant of testicular tissue or cells.


  Gunasheela Surgical and Maternity Hospital Experience in Fertility Preservation Services in Males Top


At Gunasheela Surgical and Maternity Hospital, 461 male patients diagnosed with cancer (15–45 years) opted for sperm banking services before starting their cancer treatment between 2008 and 2020. Semen specimen was collected by masturbation after being recommended to maintain 2–3 days of abstinence. Before these samples could be frozen, these samples were subjected to semen analysis, where key semen parameters were analyzed. These data were tabulated with their corresponding cancer types. Sperm concentration was seen to be lower in testicular cancer compared to hematological cancers (Hodgkin's disease, non-Hodgkin's disease, leukemia, and lymphoma) and other cancers (head-and-neck cancer, bone and soft-tissue cancer, neurological cancer, gastrointestinal cancer, lung cancer, thyroid cancer, and penile cancer). Testicular cancer patients also presented with the largest semen disorder diagnosis (asthenozoospermia, oligoasthenozoospermia, oligozoospermia, and azoospermia) compared to two other groups. Males with testicular cancer are shown to have a lower semen quality between cancer groups and compared to WHO criteria, increasing their likelihood of them being infertile.


  American Society of Clinical Oncology Recommendation in Males (2018) Top


  1. Health-care providers caring for adult and pediatric patients with cancer should address the possibility of infertility as early as possible before treatment starts[6]
  2. Health-care providers should refer patients who express an interest in fertility preservation to reproductive specialists
  3. Sperm cryopreservation: Sperm cryopreservation is effective, and health-care providers should discuss sperm banking with postpubertal males receiving cancer treatment
  4. Hormonal gonadoprotection: Hormonal therapy in men is not successful in preserving fertility. It is not recommended
  5. Other methods to preserve male fertility, such as testicular tissue cryopreservation and reimplantation or grafting of human testicular tissue, should be performed only as part of clinical trials or approved experimental protocols
  6. Postchemotherapy: Men should be advised of a potentially higher risk of genetic damage in sperm collected after initiation of therapy.



  Ethical and Moral Constrains in Oncofertility Care Top


Gamete storage for extended periods generates ethical and moral questions that need attention, before a patient opts for a fertility preservation service. Clinical staff should offer discussions to patients which includes uncertainties regarding experimental strategies and the future use of the germs cells in the face of the possibility of the death of their biological owner.[43]

Although cryopreserved sperm can remain viable for many years, experience with these techniques is too recent to ensure its security and its routine use.[16] Questions such as:

  1. How long will cryopreserved sperm stay viable?
  2. Will the freezing and thawing process affect the quality and function of the sperm?
  3. What is the safety profile of the embryos created using the sperm that were frozen for prolonged period of time?


These questions can be only answered with time and experience in this field.


  Conclusion Top


Any malignancy per say will compromise semen quality in males causing infertility or subfertility. This review addresses the gondotoxic nature of cancer therapy and the currently available options of fertility preservation in males such as semen and testicular tissue cryopreservation.

Techniques such as testicular tissue cryopreservation or freezing SSCs in prepubertal males are still experimental. The current American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines recommend semen should be frozen in young males affected by cancer. There are ethical issues which will have to be discussed with patients on an individualized base.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Mathur P, Sathishkumar K, Chaturvedi M, Das P, Sudharsan KL, Santhappan S, et al. Cancer statistics, 2020: Report from national cancer registry programme, India. JCO Glob Oncol 2020;6:1063-75.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Kaul R. Cancer Cases Could Increase by 12% in Next 5 Years: ICMR-India News-Hindustan Times; 2020. Available from: https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/cancer-cases-could-increase-by-12-in-next-5-years-icmr/story-zj9S8ZD4f16bK2ZsxiuahL.html. [Last accessed on 2020 Dec 22].  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Swaminathan R, Selvakumaran R, Esmy PO, Sampath P, Ferlay J, Jissa V, et al. Cancer pattern and survival in a rural district in South India. Cancer Epidemiol 2009;33:325-31.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Cancer Statistics | Drupal; 2018. Available from: http://nciindia.aiims.edu/en/cancer-statistics. [Last accessed on 2020 Dec 23].  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Zavras N, Ssiristatidis C, Ssiatelis A, Koumarianou A. Fertility risk assessment and preservation in male and female prepubertal and adolescent cancer patients. Clin Med Insights Oncol 2016;10:49-57.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Bizet, P., Saias-Magnan, J., Jouve, E., Grillo, J. M., Karsenty, G., Metzler-Guillemain, C. and Perrin, J. (2012) 'Sperm cryopreservation before cancer treatment: A 15-year monocentric experience', Reproductive BioMedicine Online. Reprod Biomed Online, 24(3), pp. 321–330. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.11.015.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Armenian SH, Xu L, Cannavale KL, Wong FL, Bhatia S, Chao C, et al. Cause-specific mortality in survivors of adolescent and young adult cancer. Cancer 2020;126:2305-16.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Okada K, Fujisawa M. Recovery of spermatogenesis following cancer treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy and radiotherapy. World J Mens Health 2019;37:166-74.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Dohle GR. Male infertility in cancer patients: Review of the literature. Int J Urol 2010;17:327-31.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Krzyszczyk P, Acevedo A, Davidoff EJ, Timmins LM, Marrero-Berrios I, Patel M, et al. The growing role of precision and personalized medicine for cancer treatment. Technology (Singap World Sci) 2018;6:79-100.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Schover LR. Motivation for parenthood after cancer: A review. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2005;35.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Gerstl B, Bertoldo MJ, Sullivan E, Volckmar X, Kerr A, Wand H, et al. Fatherhood following treatment for testicular cancer: A systematic review and meta-analyses. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2020;9:341-53.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Sabanegh ES, Ragheb AM. Male fertility after cancer. Urology 2009;73:225-31.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
van Casteren NJ, Pieters R, Dohle GR, van Baalen M, Neggers S, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM. Cranial irradiation does not result in pituitary-gonadal axis dysfunction in very long-term male survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia 2009;23:2310-3.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Van Casteren NJ, Boellaard WP, Romijn JC, Dohle GR. Gonadal dysfunction in male cancer patients before cytotoxic treatment. Int J Androl 2010;33:73-9.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Bizet P, Saias-Magnan J, Jouve E, Grillo JM, Karsenty G, Metzler-Guillemain C, et al. Sperm cryopreservation before cancer treatment: A 15-year monocentric experience. Reprod Biomed Online 2012;24:321-30.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Ku JY, Park NC, Jeon TG, Park HJ. Semen Analysis in Cancer Patients Referred for Sperm Cryopreservation before Chemotherapy over a 15-Year Period in Korea. World J Mens Health [Internet]. 2015;33:8.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Carlsen E, Andersson AM, Petersen JH, Skakkebæk NE. History of febrile illness and variation in semen quality. Hum Reprod 2003;18:2089-92.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Hoei-Hansen CE, Holm M, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Skakkebaek NE. Histological evidence of testicular dysgenesis in contralateral biopsies from 218 patients with testicular germ cell cancer. J Pathol 2003;200:370-4.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Meirow D, Schenker JG. Infertility: Cancer and male infertility. Hum Reprod 1995;10:2017-22.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
van Casteren NJ, van Santbrink EJ, van Inzen W, Romijn JC, Dohle GR. Use rate and assisted reproduction technologies outcome of cryopreserved semen from 629 cancer patients. Fertil Steril 2008;90:2245-50.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Ellen G, Herman T. Is there a clinical future for spermatogonial stem cells? Curr Stem Cell Res Ther 2008;2:189-95.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Wallace WH, Anderson RA, Irvine DS. Fertility preservation for young patients with cancer: Who is at risk and what can be offered? Lancet Oncol 2005;6:209-18.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Gunasheela D, Gunasheela S. Strategies for fertility preservation in young patients with cancer: A comprehensive approach. Indian J Surg Oncol 2014;5:17-29.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Ajala T, Rafi J, Larsen-Disney P, Howell R. Fertility preservation for cancer patients: A review. Obstet Gynecol Int 2010;10:1-9.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Mahmood J, Shamah AA, Creed TM, Pavlovic R Matsui H, Kimura M, et al. Radiation-induced erectile dysfunction: Recent advances and future directions. Adv Radiat Oncol 2010;16:161-9.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Meistrich ML. Male gonadal toxicity. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2009;53:261-6.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Schilsky RL, Lewis BJ, Sherins RJ, Young RC. Gonadal dysfunction in patients receiving chemotherapy for cancer. Ann Intern Med 1980;93:109-14.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Rivkees SA, Crawford JD. The relationship of gonadal activity and chemotherapy-induced gonadal damage. J Am Med Assoc 1988;259:2123-5.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Roeser HP, Stocks AE, Smith AJ. Testicular damage due to cytotoxic drugs and recovery after cessation of therapy. Aust N Z J Med 1978;8:250-4.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Mackie EJ, Radford M, Shalet SM. Gonadal function following chemotherapy fur childhood Hodgkin's disease. Med Pediatr Oncol 1996;27:74-8.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Aslam I, Fishel S, Moore H, Dowell K, Thornton S. Fertility preservation of boys undergoing anti-cancer therapy: A review of the existing situation and prospects for the future. Hum Reprod 2000;15:2154-9.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Rosenlund B, Sjöblom P, Törnblom M, Hultling C, Hillensjö T. In-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the treatment of infertility after testicular cancer. Hum Reprod 1998;13:414-8.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Fode M, Krogh-Jespersen S, Brackett NL, Ohl DA, Lynne CM, Sønksen J. Male sexual dysfunction and infertility associated with neurological disorders. Asian J Androl 2012;14:61-8.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Hovatta O. Cryopreservation of testicular tissue. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2000;169:113-5.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Goossens E, Jahnukainen K, Mitchell RT, van Pelt A, Pennings G, Rives N, et al. Fertility preservation in boys: Recent developments and new insights. Hum Reprod Open 2020;2020:1-18.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Wyns C, Collienne C, Shenfield F, Robert A, Laurent P, Roegiers L, et al. Fertility preservation in the male pediatric population: Factors influencing the decision of parents and children. Hum Reprod 2015;30:2022-30.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Wyns C, Curaba M, Martinez-Madrid B, Van Langendonckt A, François-Xavier W, Donnez J, et al. Spermatogonial survival after cryopreservation and short-term orthotopic immature human cryptorchid testicular tissue grafting to immunodeficient mice. Hum Reprod 2007;22:1603-11.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Picton HM, Wyns C, Anderson RA, Goossens E, Jahnukainen K, Kliesch S, et al. A European perspective on testicular tissue cryopreservation for fertility preservation in prepubertal and adolescent boys. Hum Reprod 2015;30:2463-75.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Daudin M, Rives N, Walschaerts M, Drouineaud V, Szerman E, Isabelle Koscinski I, et al. Sperm cryopreservation in adolescents and young adults with cancer: Results of the French national sperm banking network (CECOS). Fertil Steril 2015;103:478-86.e1.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Keros V, Rosenlund B, Hultenby K, Aghajanova L, Levkov L, Hovatta O, et al. Optimizing cryopreservation of human testicular tissue: Comparison of protocols with glycerol, propanediol and dimethylsulphoxide as cryoprotectants. Hum Reprod 2005;20:1676-87.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Keros V, Hultenby K, Borgström B, Fridström M, Jahnukainen K, Hovatta O, et al. Methods of cryopreservation of testicular tissue with viable spermatogonia in pre-pubertal boys undergoing gonadotoxic cancer treatment. Hum Reprod 2007;22:1384-95.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
de Carvalho BR, Kliemchen J, Woodruff TK. Ethical, moral and other aspects related to fertility preservation in cancer patients. JBRA Assist Reprod 2017;21:45-8.  Back to cited text no. 43
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Effect of Malign...
Impact of Oncolo...
Strategies for F...
Fertility Preser...
Gunasheela Surgi...
Ethical and Mora...
Conclusion
American Society...
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed784    
    Printed54    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded70    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal